<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Twitter Made the RSS Feed Redundant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.impactmedialtd.co.uk/blog/social-media/twitter-social-media/has-twitter-made-the-rss-feed-redundant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.impactmedialtd.co.uk/blog/social-media/twitter-social-media/has-twitter-made-the-rss-feed-redundant/</link>
	<description>A blog about search engine marketing, search engine optimisation (SEO) and Google AdWords Pay per Click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:37:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Gurd</title>
		<link>http://www.impactmedialtd.co.uk/blog/social-media/twitter-social-media/has-twitter-made-the-rss-feed-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-21178</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.impactmedialtd.co.uk/blog/?p=1404#comment-21178</guid>
		<description>That is an interesting question, shame there are no other comments as would be interested to know what people think.
My take is that Twitter will not replace anything, it will simply add another level of information to your communication network. RSS feeds will still have their place - you can access the content from 1 person in 1 place when you want. Twitter can at times be an overload unless you are using the myriad of apps that help you control the information you receive.
I think RSS will retain its value for content that is indispensible but Twitter will enable people to access a wider portfolio of information quickly without having to digest large chunks of content.
Good post, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting question, shame there are no other comments as would be interested to know what people think.<br />
My take is that Twitter will not replace anything, it will simply add another level of information to your communication network. RSS feeds will still have their place &#8211; you can access the content from 1 person in 1 place when you want. Twitter can at times be an overload unless you are using the myriad of apps that help you control the information you receive.<br />
I think RSS will retain its value for content that is indispensible but Twitter will enable people to access a wider portfolio of information quickly without having to digest large chunks of content.<br />
Good post, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
